Liver
This portion still is under construction, Thank you for visiting
Acute Liver Failure (click)
Author: Gagan K Sood, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Updated: Jun 25, 2009
Introduction
Background
Acute liver failure (ALF) is an uncommon condition in which the rapid deterioration of liver function results in coagulopathy and alteration in the mental status of a previously healthy individual. Acute liver failure often affects young people and carries a very high mortality. The term acute liver failure is used to describe the development of coagulopathy, usually an international normalized ratio (INR) of greater than 1.5, and any degree of mental alteration (encephalopathy) in a patient without preexisting cirrhosis and with an illness of less than 26 weeks' duration.
Acute liver failure is a broad term and encompasses both fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) and subfulminant hepatic failure (or late-onset hepatic failure). Fulminant hepatic failure is generally used to describe the development of encephalopathy within 8 weeks of the onset of symptoms in a patient with a previously healthy liver. Subfulminant hepatic failure is reserved for patients with liver disease for up to 26 weeks before the development of hepatic encephalopathy.
Some patients with previously unrecognized chronic liver disease decompensate and present with liver failure; although this is not technically FHF, discriminating such at the time of presentation may not be possible. Patients with Wilson disease, vertically acquiredhepatitis B virus (HBV), or autoimmune hepatitis may be included in spite of the possibility of cirrhosis if their disease has been less than 26 weeks.
Drug-related hepatotoxicity is the leading cause of acute liver failure in the United States. The outcome of acute liver failure is related to the etiology, the degree of encephalopathy, and related complications. Unfortunately, despite aggressive treatment, many patients die from fulminant hepatic failure.1,2 Before orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for fulminant hepatic failure, the mortality rate was generally greater than 80%. Approximately 6% of OLTs performed in the United States are for fulminant hepatic failure. However, with improved intensive care, the prognosis is much better now than in the past, with some series reporting approximately a survival rate of 60%.
The development of liver support systems provides some promise for this particular circumstance, although it remains a temporary measure and, to date, has no impact on survival. Other investigational therapeutic modalities, including hypothermia, have been proposed but remain unproven.3,4
For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Hepatitis Center and Liver, Gallbladder, and Pancreas Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education articles Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, and Cirrhosis.
Pathophysiology
The development of cerebral edema is the major cause of morbidity and mortality of patients suffering from acute liver failure.3,5,6The etiology of this intracranial hypertension (ICH) is not fully understood, but it is considered to be multifactorial.
Briefly, hyperammonemia may be involved in the development of cerebral edema. Brain edema is thought to be both cytotoxic and vasogenic in origin. Cytotoxic edema is the consequence of impaired cellular osmoregulation in the brain, resulting in astrocyte edema. Cortical astrocyte swelling is the most common observation in neuropathologic studies of brain edema in acute liver failure. In the brain, ammonia is detoxified to glutamine via amidation of glutamate by glutamine synthetase. The accumulation of glutamine in astrocytes results in astrocyte swelling and brain edema. There is clear evidence of increased brain concentration of glutamine in animal models of acute liver failure. The relationship among high ammonia, glutamine, and raised ICH has been reported in humans.
Another phenomenon that has been involved in acute liver failure is the increase of intracranial blood volume and cerebral blood flow. The increased cerebral blood flow results because of disruption of cerebral autoregulation. The disruption of cerebral autoregulation is thought to be mediated by elevated systemic concentrations of nitric oxide, which acts as a potent vasodilator. However, in this setting, cytokine profiles are also deranged. Elevated serum concentrations of bacterial endotoxin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a), and interleukin-1 (IL-1) and -6 (IL-6) have been found in fulminant hepatic failure.
Another consequence of fulminant hepatic failure is multisystem organ failure, which is often observed in the context of a hyperdynamic circulatory state that mimics sepsis (low systemic vascular resistance); therefore, circulatory insufficiency and poor organ perfusion possibly either initiate or promote complications of fulminant hepatic failure.
The development of liver failure represents the final common outcome of a wide variety of potential causes, as the broad differential diagnosis suggests (see Other Problems to Be Considered). A complete discussion is beyond the scope of this article, and the reader is directed to consult the literature dealing specifically with these underlying etiologic factors. However, mechanisms of acetaminophen hepatotoxicity are worth discussing briefly.
As with many drugs that undergo hepatic metabolism (in this case, by cytochrome P-450), the oxidative metabolite of acetaminophen is more toxic than the drug.2,7,8,9 An active metabolite, N -acetyl-p-benzoquinone-imine (NAPQI), appears to mediate much of the damage to liver tissue by forming covalent bonds with cellular proteins. Therefore, the presence of highly reactive free radicals following acetaminophen ingestion poses a threat to the liver parenchyma, but it is usually addressed adequately by intrahepatic glutathione reserves. The reduced glutathione quenches the reactive metabolites and acts to prevent nonspecific oxidation of cellular structures that may result in severe hepatocellular dysfunction.
This mechanism fails in 2 different yet equally important settings. The first is an overdose (accidental or intentional) of acetaminophen. This simply overwhelms the hepatic stores of glutathione, allowing reactive metabolites to escape. The second and less obvious scenario occurs with a patient who consumes alcohol regularly. This does not necessarily require a history of alcohol abuse or alcoholism. Even a moderate or social drinker who consistently consumes 1-2 drinks daily may sufficiently deplete intrahepatic glutathione reserves. This results in potentially lethal hepatotoxicity from what is otherwise a safe dose of acetaminophen (below the maximum total dose of 4 g/d) in an unsuspecting individual.
Frequency
United States
The incidence of fulminant hepatic failure appears to be low, with approximately 2000 cases annually occurring in the United States. Drug-related hepatotoxicity comprises more than 50% of acute liver failure cases, including acetaminophen toxicity (42%) and idiosyncratic drug reactions (12%). Nearly 15% of cases remain of indeterminate etiology. Other causes seen in the United Statesare hepatitis B disease, autoimmune hepatitis, Wilson disease, fatty liver of pregnancy, and HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets) syndrome.
International
Acetaminophen or paracetamol overdoses are prominent causes of FHF in Europe and, in particular, Great Britain. In the developing world, acute HBV infection dominates as a cause of fulminant hepatic failure because of the high prevalence of HBV. Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) superinfection is much more common in developing countries than in the United States because of the high rate of chronic HBV infection. Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is associated with a high incidence of fulminant hepatic failure in women who are pregnant and is of concern in pregnant patients living in or traveling through endemic areas. These regions include, but are not limited to, Mexico and Central America, India and the subcontinent, and the Middle East.
Mortality/Morbidity
Several factors contribute to morbidity and mortality in cases of liver failure.
The etiologic factor leading to liver failure and the development of complications are the main determinants of liver failure. Patients with acute liver failure caused by acetaminophen have a better prognosis than those with an indeterminate form of the disorder. Patients with stage 3 or 4 encephalopathy have a poor prognosis. The risk of mortality increases with the development of any of the complications, which include cerebral edema, renal failure, adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), coagulopathy, and infection.
Race
Acute liver failure is seen among all races. In a US multicenter study of acute liver failure, the ethnic distribution included whites (74%), Hispanics (10%), blacks (3%), Asians (5%), and Latin Americans (2%).8,9,13
Sex
Viral hepatitis E and autoimmune liver disease are more common in women than in men. In a US multicenter study group, acute liver failure was seen more often in women (73%) than in men.
Age
Age may be pertinent to morbidity and mortality in those with acute liver failure. Patients younger than 10 years and older than 40 years tend to fare relatively poorly. According to a US multicenter study group, women with acute liver failure were older (39 y) than men (32.5 y).
Clinical History
All patients with clinical or laboratory evidence of moderate or severe acute hepatitis should have immediate measurement of prothrombin time (PT) and careful evaluation of mental status. The patients should be admitted to the hospital if there is alteration in mental sensorium or prothrombin time is prolonged.
Physical
Table. Grading of Hepatic Encephalopathy
Table
Grade
Level of Consciousness
Personality and Intellect
Neurologic Signs
Electroencephalogram (EEG) Abnormalities
Normal
Normal
None
None
Subclinical
Normal
Normal
Abnormalities only on psychometric testing
None
1
Day/night sleep reversal, restlessness
Forgetfulness, mild confusion, agitation, irritability
Tremor, apraxia, incoordination, impaired handwriting
Triphasic waves (5 Hz)
2
Lethargy, slowed responses
Disorientation to time, loss of inhibition, inappropriate behavior
Asterixis, dysarthria, ataxia, hypoactive reflexes
Triphasic waves (5 Hz)
3
Somnolence, confusion
Disorientation to place, aggressive behavior
Asterixis, muscular rigidity, Babinski signs, hyperactive reflexes
Triphasic waves (5 Hz)
4
Coma
None
Decerebration
Delta/slow wave activity
Grade
Level of Consciousness
Personality and Intellect
Neurologic Signs
Electroencephalogram (EEG) Abnormalities
Normal
Normal
None
None
Subclinical
Normal
Normal
Abnormalities only on psychometric testing
None
1
Day/night sleep reversal, restlessness
Forgetfulness, mild confusion, agitation, irritability
Tremor, apraxia, incoordination, impaired handwriting
Triphasic waves (5 Hz)
2
Lethargy, slowed responses
Disorientation to time, loss of inhibition, inappropriate behavior
Asterixis, dysarthria, ataxia, hypoactive reflexes
Triphasic waves (5 Hz)
3
Somnolence, confusion
Disorientation to place, aggressive behavior
Asterixis, muscular rigidity, Babinski signs, hyperactive reflexes
Triphasic waves (5 Hz)
4
Coma
None
Decerebration
Delta/slow wave activity
Causes
Numerous causes of fulminant hepatic failure exist, but drug-related hepatotoxicity due to acetaminophen and idiosyncratic drug reactions is the most common cause of acute liver failure in the United States. For nearly 15% of patients, the cause remains indeterminate.
Acute Liver Failure: Treatment & Medication (click)
Author: Gagan K Sood, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Updated: Jun 25, 2009
Medical Care
The most important step is to identify the cause of liver failure. Prognosis of acute liver failure is dependent on etiology. A few etiologies of acute liver failure demand immediate and specific treatment. It is also critical to identify those patients who will be candidates for liver transplantation.
The most important aspect of treatment in patients with acute liver failure is to provide good intensive care support.13,16,17,18Patients with grade II encephalopathy should be transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) for monitoring. As the patient develops progressive encephalopathy, protection of the airway is important.
Most patients with acute liver failure tend to develop some degree of circulatory dysfunction. Careful attention should be paid to fluid management, hemodynamics, metabolic parameters, and surveillance of infection. Maintenance of nutrition and prompt recognition of gastrointestinal bleeding are crucial. Coagulation parameters, CBC count, and metabolic panel should be checked frequently. Serum aminotransferases and bilirubin are generally measured daily to follow the course of infection. Intensive care management includes recognition and management of complications.
Surgical Care
Liver transplantation is the definitive treatment in liver failure, but a detailed discussion is beyond the scope of this article. Although, 2 recent studies regarding liver transplantation are mentioned below, preoperative management is emphasized in this section.
Lerut et al evaluated the effect of tacrolimus monotherapy in 156 adults receiving a primary liver graft, randomizing them to receive tacrolimus-placebo and tacrolimus-low-dose, short-term (64 days), steroid immunosuppression. There were no exclusion criteria at randomization, and all patients had a 12-month follow-up (range, 12-84).20
The investigators found that the patients in the tacrolimus-steroid group had higher 3- and 12-month survival rates, as well as higher 12-month graft survival rates, relative to those in the tacrolimus-placebo group. Not only were fewer patients in the tacrolimus-steroid group administered rejection treatment at 3 and 12 months, but fewer individuals in this group and the group of 145 patients transplanted without artificial organ support demonstrated corticosteroid-resistant rejection at 3 and 12 months.20
By 1 year, 82% (64/78) of those in the tacrolimus steroid group were on tacrolimus monotherapy compared with 78.2% (61/78) of those in the tacrolimus-placebo group (P = 0.54). However, when considering the 74 tacrolimus-steroid and 67 tacrolimus-placebo survivors, rates of monotherapy were lower in the tacrolimus-steroid group versus the tacrolimus-placebo group (P = 0.39).20
Lerut et al concluded that tacrolimus monotherapy can be achieved safely without compromising graft nor patient survival in a primary, even unselected, adult liver transplant population and that such a strategy may lead to further large-scale minimization studies in liver transplantation.20 The investigators attributed the higher incidence of early corticosteroid-resistant rejection in the tacrolimus-placebo group to the significantly higher number of patients transplanted while being on artificial organ support and recommended that the monodrug immunosuppressive strategy would require adaptation in this setting.20
In a retrospective study, Taketomi et al evaluated donor safety in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation by establishing a selection criterion for donors in which the left lobe was the first choice of graft.21 Two hundred and six consecutive donors were divided into 2 groups according to the graft type (left [n = 137] vs right lobe [n =69]). Mean intraoperative blood loss was significantly increased in the left lobe donors compared with right lobe donors; however, mean peak postoperative total bilirubin levels and duration of hospital stay after surgery were significantly less for those in the left lobe group (P <0.05).21
No donor died or suffered a life-threatening complication during the study period. The investigators noted that logistic regression analysis revealed that only graft type (left vs right lobe) was significantly related to the occurrence of biliary complications (odds ratio 0.11; P = 0.0012).21 However, there were no significant differences regarding the cumulative overall graft survival rates between the recipients with left lobe grafts and those with right lobe grafts.
Consultations
Managing fulminant hepatic failure is a team effort. Consultations in the areas of intensive care, gastroenterology, infectious diseases, hematology, neurology, neurosurgery, and transplantation surgery may be needed to address the myriad complex issues that can confront the medical staff.
Diet
Activity
Bedrest is recommended.
Medication
Multiple medications may be necessary in patients with acute liver failure because of the wide variety of complications that may develop from fulminant hepatic failure. Decreased hepatic metabolism and the potential for hepatotoxicity become central issues. Antidotes that effectively bind or eliminate A phalloides toxin and toxic metabolites of acetaminophen are essential.
Acetaminophen ingestion of more than 10 g may be hepatotoxic due to formation of a highly reactive toxic intermediate metabolite, which is ordinarily metabolized further in the presence of glutathione to N -acetyl-p-aminophenol-mercaptopurine. Administering NAC permits restitution of intrahepatic glutathione. NAC is most effective when administered within 12-20 hours following acetaminophen overdose. Never administer aminoglycosides and NSAIDs, because the potential for nephrotoxicity is exaggerated greatly in this setting.
DISCLAIMER
The information contained on this website is for informational purposes only, and should not be used to replace professional medical advice. Visitors to the website are responsible for how they chose to utilize this content.
This information should not be considered complete, nor should it be relied on in diagnosing or treating a medical condition. Content on this website does not contain information on all diseases, ailments, physical conditions or their treatment.
It is best to seek advice and attention from your physician or qualified healthcare professional. Always consult your physician before beginning a new treatment, diet or fitness program.
Walnut HealthCare and the participating hospitals do not endorse nor have responsibility for the content of any other websites linked to or from www.walnuthealthcare.com or www.walnuthealthcare.org.
Please note that all inpatient pharmacists at the participating hospitals are trained and contiuously recertified before they can use any of the protocols per pharmacy on patients. Per Pharmacy Protocols are those Protocols which are approved by hospital’s P&T committee and to which the pharmacy adheres in order to provide medications to patients in a safe, efficient and ethical manner.
DailyMed Advanced Search Medicines Micromedex - comp UpToDate
HOME PAGE ANTICOGULATION LIVER HEALTHY EATING HEALTHY RECIPES ONE-DISH RECIPES SALADS SOUPS SPICES SUPERFRUITS APPLES BERRIES FRUITS GRAPES JUICES MANGOS PECANS POMEGRANATE WALNUT VEGAN REVIEWS VEGETARIANISM VEGETABLES HEALTHY DIET ASPARAGUS BELL PEPPERS BROCOLLI BRUSSELS SPROUTES CARROTS CAULIFLOWER GARLIC GREEN PEAS LIMA BEANS MUSHROOMS, CRIMINI ONIONS SPINACH TOMATOES ELLAGIC ACID YOU TUBE REFERENCES BLOG POSTS CANCER SOCIETY JUGLONE RESEARCH OHIO STATE UNIV. SOUTH CAROLINA EXCERCISE DANCE MUSIC TAI CHI YOGA GERIATRICS LONGEVITY HAPPY LIVING STRESS REDUCTION POLYPHENOLS ANTIOXYDANTS FLAVONOIDS OLIVE OIL POMEGRANATE RED WINE MORE...